Eunoia
Use Ctrl+ to enlarge this blog page if you need to.
AI bots are not permitted to scrape this site nor steal content. | ||
--> Most recent Blog Comments Policy DSGVO Impressum Maths trivia Search this site RSS Feed Eunoia, who is a grumpy, overeducated, facetious, multilingual naturalised German, blatantly opinionated, old (1944-vintage), amateur cryptologist, computer consultant, atheist, flying instructor, bulldog-lover, Porsche-driver, textbook-writer and blogger living in the foothills south of the northern German plains. Not too shy to reveal his true name or even whereabouts, he blogs his opinions, and humour and rants irregularly. Stubbornly he clings to his beliefs, e.g. that Faith does not give answers, it only prevents you doing any goddamn questioning. You are as atheist as he is. When you understand why you don't believe in all the other gods, you will know why he does not believe in yours. Oh, and after the death of his old bulldog, Kosmo, he also has a new bulldog, Clara, since September 2018 :-)
Some of my bikes
My Crypto Pages
|
Friday, June 28, 2024
A very amusing bookHere is yet another book I can thoroughly recommend. It was given to me as an 80th birthday present by friend Lothar, to whom many thanks. The author is Randall Munroe, probably better known in the internet as cartoonist "xkcd", so the illustrations are in his stick-figure style. I already own three of his previous books, What If ?, How To and Thing Explainer all geeky. This one gives serious scientific answers to the most absurd questions. The ISBN is 978-1-473-68062-3. Hardback with about 350 pages. Do go get a copy and you will enjoy reading it, as I did. Tuesday, June 25, 2024
Pythagoras on a SphereBack in the old days of ancient Greece many people thought the Earth was flat (been reading too many Discworld® novels probably). And so we got Euclidean geometry on a plane. Indeed, Pythagoras proved that A2 + B2 = C2 for right-angled triangles only on planes; something we all learned in school. Here's my proof of Pythagoras' theorem :-) Now imagine if Pythagoras had known that the Earth is a ball, not a plane. What would his theorem look like for a spherical right triangle? Certainly not A2 + B2 = C2 ! First off, we need to define what we mean by a spherical triangle. A great circle on a sphere is any circle whose centre coincides with the centre of the sphere. Arcs of great circles are the shortest distance between two points on the surface. Long distance aircraft thus fly along arcs of great circles (ignoring the effects of winds), and ships sail along them too. There are four great circles in the sketch shown below.
A spherical triangle is any 3-sided region enclosed by sides that are arcs of great circles. If one corner angle is a right angle, the triangle is a spherical right triangle. In a spherical right triangle, let C be the length of the side opposite the right angle (the hypoteneuse).
Let A and B be the lengths of the other two sides.
Let R denote the radius of the sphere (or Earth on our case).
Then Pythagoras' Theorem on a sphere tells us that
cosine(C/R) = cosine(A/R) * cosine(B/R). Now I won't bore you non-maths-geeks with my proof thereof and
the maths-geeks can surely derive it themselves. Please note that as R goes to infinity the world gets flat and this equation
devolves back to So when someone asks you about Pythagoras' theorem, just tell them cosine(C/R) = cosine(A/R) * cosine(B/R), after all, A2 + B2 = C2 is just a special case ;-)
PS: I originally showed you this in 2009, so I am just repeating myself. Fryday, June 21
Dracarys!R ecently Chuckhas been writing about House of the Dragon and he has a theory,"I prefer to think the dragon legends come down to us from a previous civilization that had mechanized, flying war machines like the A-10 Warthog. After that civilization collapsed and the art of heavier-than-air aircraft was lost, how would you explain something like an A-10 to your kids? "There were fire breathing monsters that flew through the air and destroyed everything in their path". That's how." Later, he did a post detailing how (wing area vs. mass) dragons flew etc, do go read it please. But I decided to follow up on the Warthog idea, as follows. The A-10 Warthog is a plane carrying a really big Gatling gun. Or it is a really big Gatling gun which happens to be carried by an airplane, in the nose. The Warthog will do a low-altitude strafing run at 300 Knots and, if it were to use all of its ammunition at once, would use it all up in just 17 seconds. Here is the maths I did. The plane flies at about 300 knots usually (roughly 156 m/sec) and weighs some 19 tons. The magazine can hold 1350 rounds, each weighing about a pound, of which the bullet weighs lets say 200 grams (guessing, in the absence of me knowing the facts). Muzzle velocity is Mach 3 = 1000 m/sec. So 1350 * 0.2 * 1000 = 270,000 kg-m/s of bullets' momentum, divided by those 19 airplane tons implies 14.3 m/sec = about 28 knots of deceleration for firing all that ammo; more when the bigger magazines were later introduced. So 300-28 = 272 knots speed at the end of this example Dracarys run. After the strafing run, the Warthog pulls up sharply to get out of enemy ground fire. But just how sharply? Well stall speed for a Warthog in level flight is given as 120 knots, but stall speed increases with the square of the G-loading of the pull-up. Now 272/120 = 2.27 and 2.272= 5.1529, so let us say a 5G pull-up would stall the plane. Even I could pull 5G when doing aerobatics in the Pitts biplane, but fighter jocks with the G-suits (inflatable trousers) regularly can pull 9 G, so would have to be careful not to stall the Warthog. BTW, 17 seconds of firing at an average of 286 knots implies the target is a tank/vehicle column about 2.5 km long and straight, unlikely even for Russian tanks (do they have that many left?). So this is an unlikely scenario. And do you know why the Mother of Dragons uses the command Dracarys? Because Supermarine had already taken the English translation "Spit Fire!" ;-) And why Mother of Dragons? Well, Lockheed had already used the name Dragon Lady for their U2 spyplane ;-)
Comments (4) The oldest photo Wikipedia knows about is from 1826, a French photo of a view from an upstairs window, using bitumen as the medium. Pinhole camera, exposure time was about 9 hours.
In 1837 a pinhole camera took the first photo made in Germany; the photo is of the Frauenkirche (Our Lady`s church) in Munich, taken in March of 1837; exposure time was several hours.
Sepia.
1860 saw the first aerial photo taken from a tethered balloon over Boston, Mass.
1861 : First colour photo. Tartan Ribbon, taken by no less a person than famous physicist James Clerk Maxwell in 1861, based on his 1855 research.
1882, showing Navajo youth Tom Torlino as he started the Carlisle Indian Industrial School (USA) and 3 years later, first Indian graduate there afaik.
Another Black and White (sic!) photo. George Mclaurin, first black man to be admitted to the University of Oklahoma.
It was 1948 and US was still segregated, so he had to sit separated from the white students.
1978 saw the start of Microsoft, who bought 86-DOS 1.10, renamed it MS-DOS.
Our most recent photo, SWMBO and I on my 80th birthday; photo by Andreas.
Comments (2) L2R: Matthias, Andreas, Dieter, the other Matthias.
On the left: Peter and Rüdiger
Frank with Marion
L2R: All in profile, Thomas, Marion, Dirk, Hans-Jürgen
Marion, Matthias, Dieter, Hans-Jürgen, Dirk, Volker, Thomas listen as ...
..... Matthias reads his self-written Laudatio poem.
And I just bask in the sunshine as his Laudatio is read.
After all had gone, SWMBO relaxes in the hammock.
Comments (1)
Turned 80 today. Hurrah! Having been ill recently, I didn't think I was going to make it. Subdued party tomorrow, so photos to follow.
Comments(12)
|
Index/Home | Impressum | Sitemap | Search site/www |